|
The high of the book's incredible success came to a crashing end on Jan. 8, however, when the Smoking Gun Web site published a report about Frey's accounts, saying that the author embellished, and even invented, some of his material
Winfrey began by apologizing to viewers for a telephone call she made to CNN's "Larry King Live" show on January 11, while King was interviewing Frey about the controversy. In the call Winfrey said that even though the facts were being questioned, the book "still resonates with me" and called the controversy "much ado about nothing."
"I regret that phone call," she told her viewers on Thursday. "I made a mistake and I left the impression that the truth does not matter and I am deeply sorry about that. That is not what I believe."
Sitting with Frey in side-by-side easy chairs, Winfrey quizzed the author point-by-point about his book that described his drug-and-alcohol addiction and the people hurt by it.
"All the way through the book I altered details about every one of the characters," Frey said "Every one of the characters was altered," including himself.
And even while Frey admitted altering information that he presented as facts, he maintained his book is a memoir.
"I don't think it's a novel. I still think it's a memoir," he said. "I don't feel like I conned you. I still think the book is about drug addiction and alcoholism and no one is disputing that I was a drug addict and an alcoholic, and it's about the battle to overcome that."
Among the facts he admitted to embellishing: he was jailed for only a few hours, not 87 days; and each character in the book wasn't wholly represented.
"Every one of the people in the book existed. I altered things about all of them," he said.
"And you altered things about yourself," Winfrey said.
She pressed: "Why would you lie about the time you spent in jail?"
"I think part of what happened with a number of the things in the book, is when you go through an experience like the one I went through you develop different coping mechanisms. I think one of the coping mechanisms I developed was this image of myself that was greater than what I was," he said.
Asked if The Smoking Gun Web site which first questioned the book had accurately characterized the discrepancies, Frey said "I think most of what they wrote was pretty accurate," adding they did "a good job."
As for Frey, he's hoping to learn from the whole ordeal.
"I feel like I came here and (have) been honest with you, and essentially admitted to lying. It's not an easy thing to do in front of an audience full of people and a lot of others watching on TV," he told Winfrey.
"If I come out of this with anything, it's being a better person and learning from my mistakes and making sure I don't repeat them."
|
Comments
Can you say: "Marketing Ploy?" I'm sooooo very tired of hearing about Oprah. BTW-she's looking like Micheal Jackson a bit to me Ewwwwwwwww!
Posted by: tRACY | January 27, 2006 12:25 PM
ha! how embarrassing. so, oprah was conned and the idiot actually phoned in to defend a man she knew nothing about, except what he wrote in his book? she should've left it alone. lol i cant believe he went on her show to tell america his book should've basically been in the fiction section. this is SO not a big deal -- i mean, there's people dying and people sleeping on the streets and whatnot. why can't she do a show about that? oh yeah, a natural disaster didn't occur. whatever.
Posted by: gigi | January 27, 2006 7:39 PM
haha no way... michael jackson is way better than opera winfery... thats sooo NOT ewwww ....
Love Love
helaina_mj
Posted by: helaina | January 27, 2006 8:52 PM
oprah is disrespectful and i am starting not to like her show because all she does is critisize people.
Posted by: Sara | January 29, 2006 12:54 AM
The matter I feel is a little stupid. It warrants no significant criticism. Books are fabricated all the time, so this incident should not be so significant. People, and you should know who, are constantly trying to discredit Ms. Winfrey in an attempt to destroy her creditability. I say Mr. James wrote a book with some misrepresentation in it, but overall it gave a positive message. People are strange because instead of focusing on the positive impact of the book, the negative aspects were used to fire personal attacks at James and Ms. Winfrey. Stop the nonsense, stop the attack, and simple buy or not buy the book. Case closed!!!!!
Posted by: tommy townsend jr. | February 3, 2006 1:52 PM